ociations to back them. Actors have the Screen Actors Guild. I just dont see how that is not pursued in this sport within the

Editors:The Associated Press Top 25 poll has been an essential part of college football for 80 years. For the first time, the AP has compiled the data from the more than 1,100 weekly polls to determine the All-Time Top 100 programs. To help you with your planning for this special package, we will have the following lists, stories and with photos in coming weeks. For questions, please call 212-621-1630 or email Barry Bedlan (bbedlan(at)ap.org), Dave Zelio (dzelio(at)ap.org) or Ed Montes (emontes(at)ap.org.All times Eastern.DIGITAL NEWS EXPERIENCEAll the content in this advisory will be available through the College Football Digital News Experience, which is a fully curated digital presentation focused entirely on APs college football coverage and anchored around the marquee AP Top 25 poll. The site, which is responsive to all devices, is available for free and even pays a revenue share to participating sites. The DNE allows for local customization of the site logo, navigation bar, highlighted teams and other features, including embeddable widgets around the poll and Latest News. Some examples: http://collegefootball.ap.org/tampabay and http://collegefootball.ap.org/newsday. Contact your local sales representative or Barry Bedlan at bbedlan(at)ap.org to take advantage of this free digital offering.WHO IS BEST?FBC--T25-ALL-TIME AP POLLTo look back, all the way back, to the first Top 25 college football poll is to take a walk through history. The great teams at Notre Dame and Army, at Oklahoma and Alabama, the coaching greats like Bud Wilkinson and Bobby Bowden, Joe Paterno, Lou Holtz and Nick Saban. For the first time, The Associated Press has sorted through all those polls -- all 1,103 of them -- to determine the top 100 programs of all time after eight decades of arguing whos the best. By College Football Writer Ralph D. Russo. UPCOMING: Aug. 2 at 2 p.m.FBC-- T25-ALL-TIME AP POLL -THE TOP 100-LISTThe Top 100 college football teams of all time as determined by The Associated Press Top 25. By College Football Writer Ralph D. Russo. UPCOMING: 2,500 words. Capsules on the best 25 teams, then a list of the remaining 75 on Aug. 2 at 2 p.m. Will be featured on special page of the College Football DNE.FBC-- T25-ALL-TIME AP POLL -THE NO. 1s-LISTAll 44 teams ranked No. 1 at least once over the 80 years, with capsules that include the overall top team for each school. By College Football Writer Ralph D. Russo. UPCOMING: 2,000 words, photos on Aug. 4 at 2 p.m. Will be featured on special page of the College Football DNE.THE DECADE STORIESThrough analysis of the data some clear themes begin to emerge over the 80 years of the poll. Our college football writers take an in-depth look at the evolution of the sport in a series of eight stories to be released in two four-day blocks, Aug. 14-17 and Aug. 22-25.FBC--T25-ALL-TIME AP POLL -1930s-40sThe Associated Press college football poll was created to try to answer the simplest yet most divisive question in sports: Whos better? The poll helped give a regional sport more of a national scope. The poll helped define the Army-Notre Dame rivalry in the 1940s and was part of their games becoming major events. By John Kekis. UPCOMING: 700 words, photos to move Aug. 14.FBC--T25-ALL-TIME AP POLL -1950sBy the 1950s, college footballs power has drifted away from the elite eastern schools and into the Midwest. Bud Wilkinsons Oklahoma dynasty dominated the polls as it set a record winning streak that still stands. By College Football Writer Eric Olson. UPCOMING: 700 words, photos to move Aug. 15.FBC--T25-ALL-TIME AP POLL -1960sThe focus on the national championship race and the polls reached new heights in the 1960s, with a peak in 1966 when the matchup of No. 1 Notre Dame and No. 2 Michigan State late in the season ended in a famous 10-10 tie. By College Football Writer Ralph D. Russo. UPCOMING: 700 words, photos to move Aug. 16.FBC--T25-ALL-TIME AP POLL -1970sCoaching icons dominated the AP poll during the 1970s with Bear Bryant at Alabama, Joe Paterno at Penn State, Woody Hayes at Ohio State, Bo Schembechler at Michigan, Barry Switzer at Oklahoma and Tom Osborne at Nebraska. Their matchups would often help determine who was No. 1. By College Football Writer Ralph D. Russo. UPCOMING: 700 words, photos to move Aug. 17.FBC--T25-ALL-TIME AP POLL -1980sA new dynasty emerges in Miami, where the brash Hurricanes upend the established Midwestern powers, with pro-style offenses and speedy defenses that smother option football. It takes a little while for AP poll voters to catch up to the power shift, but when they do, Miami becomes a fixture. By Tim Reynolds. UPCOMING: 700 words, photos to move Aug. 22.FBC--T25-ALL-TIME AP POLL-1990sControversial championships, sometimes with the AP poll breaking one way and the coaches poll going the other, are the catalyst for the bowls and conferences to start working toward a more definitive way to determine the national title. Eventually, it becomes the BCS. By College Football Writer Ralph D. Russo. UPCOMING: 700 words, photos to move Aug. 23.FBC--T25-ALL-TIME AP POLL-2000sThe first half of the decade is dominated by USCs unprecedented run at No. 1, but then the SEC takes over. The overlap produces the last split national champion with the Trojans taking the AP title and LSU winning the BCS. The constant controversy leads to the AP asking out of the BCS process. By David Brandt. UPCOMING: 700 words, photos to move Aug. 24.FBC--T25-ALL-TIME AP POLL-2010sA new power emerges in Oregon, a rarity for college football. But an old one in Alabama dominates as Nick Saban reigns. AP voters are asked to judge a changing brand of football that is played fast and furious and often without a lot of defense. By John Zenor. UPCOMING: 700 words, photos to move Aug. 25.The APCheap Diamondbacks Jerseys . Lack made 20 saves for his third shutout of the season as the Canucks blanked the St. Louis Blues 1-0 in the first post-Olympic game for both teams night. Diamondbacks Jerseys 2019 . -- Anaheim Ducks defenceman Luca Sbisa will be out at least six weeks with a torn tendon in his right hand. https://www.cheapdiamondbacksjerseys.us/ . -- Edmontons Val Sweeting is two wins away from a trip to Winnipeg to play in Canadas Road of the Rings in December. Arizona Diamondbacks Gear .05 million next season unless Graham and the Saints subsequently agree on a long-term deal. The designation was released Monday after the deadline passed for NFL teams to use franchise or transition tags on players becoming free agents. Arizona Diamondbacks Shirts . A knee to the thigh might have stung him the most, but his sixth straight double-double made up for the brief burst of pain.The UFC announced that it had been sold for $4 billion earlier this month, changing hands from previous owners Lorenzo and Frank Fertitta to entertainment empire WME-IMG and a group of investors.When asked to describe his reaction to the sale, which is the largest financial transaction in sports history, one current UFC athlete said, At first, it was just one big blank.After an initial shock, many fighters said they immediately began wondering, What does this mean for me? What does it mean for the landscape of mixed martial arts?ESPN.com has spent the last week talking to various fighters and managers on those topics. The short answer is no one knows exactly what will change with this sale. Many of the conversations, however, seemed to center around certain points.There is a genuine well done feeling toward former parent company Zuffa and the Fertitta brothers, who purchased the UFC for $2 million in 2001, along with an acknowledgment of the positive effect they and UFC president Dana White have had on the sport. Cashing out to the tune of $4 billion? Good for them.At the same time, there is a genuine hope that this sale, whether directly or indirectly, will greatly improve financial aspects for the athletes.For starters, new ownership presumably has a plan for a return on its $4 billion investment, and more revenue streams flowing into the company is a good thing for everyone, fighters included.Theres also the hope of a more equal revenue share between ownership and athletes. The UFCs financial information is private, so official data on revenue splits is unavailable. Most within the sport, however, estimate athletes receive a percentage well below that of other professional sports. Athletes would like to see more benefits, including retirement packages, health care and less restrictive contracts that allow them to build their own brand.The possibility of a fighters union or association came up repeatedly during discussions about the sale.Below are direct quotes from a handful of fighters and managers on these topics. Many of those who spoke to ESPN.com were willing to be on record, but others preferred to remain anonymous. For the purpose of this story, the decision was made to keep all statements anonymous.This is a relatively small sample size, considering the number of active fighters in the UFC, but efforts were made to speak to a wide range of athletes in terms of age, value of previous fight purses, weight class, etc.ManagerGood for [Zuffa] at the end of the day. I think it just shows how healthy this sport is. Its now time to raise the bar for the athletes.Theres a huge gap in fighter pay between the haves and have nots. There is still this unknown way of negotiating. In the NFL, NBA, MLB -- there is so much visibility on information. You know going into a negotiation that there is a range to your value, and even then, those negotiations can take months. With fighters, a lot of times, its a fire sale. A big fight has been offered that is only two weeks away and now theres pressure to do a deal.A lot of fighters dont necessarily understand things on a real sophisticated level -- not because they cant, thats just not where theyre spending their time. But Im assuming a lot of them are reacting to $4 billion like, Why the hell am I only being paid this? I would dare to say the entire roster is a pissed-off motivated right now. I would guess youll see a lot more holdouts and a lot more free agency testing because this sale shows how healthy the business is.Things are already changing. The last few years, the UFC has probably experienced more than they ever have in the way of an FTC investigation, an antitrust lawsuit against them, athletes pushing the envelope -- it has changed, you know? And I think Lorenzo was like, S---, Im out.Fighter (more than five years with UFC, has fought for title)I am cautiously optimistic about what this means for fighters. I feel like their opinion and their attitude toward fighters so far is that we need the UFC more than the UFC needs us. Were expendable. There are 1,000 other guys ready to line up and fight, which is true, but its kind of a s--- place to be.I make a good living doing what I do. Ive been one of the more fortunate, but I feel fighters should be more secure. A lot of these guys are paycheck to paycheck, fight to fight. We pay coaches, managers, taxes -- were taking all the physical risk and only pocketing half our money. When you see a fight purse, 50 percent of that is going elsewhere. We are going to be living with long-term ramifications of competing in a combat sport, and it would be nice to have some security, maybe a monthly stipend for training.Were technically independent contractors, but were subject to things like the new Reebok deal, where we have to wear something required. We have limited health care, but we dont have health care for our families. We have no retirement. It would be awesome to be getting even a fraction of what other pro athletes are getting paid. These new owners might be able to expand the brand and get more opportunities to continue taking MMA mainstream. Im cautiously optimistic that could include some of the these things.I think if fighters organized we would definitely have a lot more leverage. I dont know what thats going to look like with regards to the new ownership. I know the Fertittas have been fighting unions in their casino business for years, thats fairly well known. With them out of the picture, Im wondering if it would be easier for us to organize. But if there were something like a fighter strike, theres a lot of ifs involved. Were in a tough position. The UFC keeps the top guys happy, and those are the key figures youre going to need in order to have any leverage. Without them, you dont have s---.ManagerSomebody just spent $4 billion. So, if you expect them to come in and say, We just spent $4 billion based on the numbers these guys have had on the books, now the first thing were going to do is raise the numbers for our athletes and dwindle our profits? The chances of that happening are slim to none, but I think its something that can happen over time. The new ownership needs to come in and create more income streams. When they do that, there will be more money for everyone, including the fighters.Im assuming all contract negotiations go through Dana White now. Whatever deals [UFC matchmakers] Joe Silva and Sean Shelby dont do, those will go through Dana. I doubt these new guys would get involved with something they dont really know yet. I dont know if you can call [WME head] Ari Emanuel and have him negotiate an MMA deal tomorrow.In the past, the negotiating process was different for each athlete. Some guys get on better with Dana, others got on better with Lorenzo. Now that Lorenzo is stepping down, you would hope theres some sort of balance added to Dana. In other words, Im hoping that whoever comes in will be a good balance with Dana. If theres a fighter Dana isnt high on, is there a CEO or someone else who would understand that and say, I should handle this one.I think there would be more worry if Dana wasnt staying on, if these guys were selling and walking away completely. But I also only believe Dana White wiill stay for a transitional period.dddddddddddd I dont think hes going to be with the company for a long time. Its hard to wake up every day and listen to somebody new when you have $400 million in the bank.Fighter (less than five years with UFC)Im very lucky in that Im a younger guy. There are people who have paved the way for me through blood, sweat and tears. Ive been hearing athletes say, Were going to get that professional athlete money now. Lets be honest, were not near that yet.The former owners were so invested in it because its something they created. It was theirs. In many ways, they believed, right or wrong, the UFC was their brand so they should be making 70 percent of the profits or whatever it was. This company taking over maybe doesnt have that same emotion. Maybe theyll look at it as, It will help our product if our athletes make X amount of money, because now they can focus more on it. Theres another punch to this, and thats the next generation. Soccer moms taking their kids to soccer, maybe that turns into MMA. If youre looking at it through the perspective of the parents, if theres a future in MMA, maybe theyll push them in that direction.The sport is only 20 years old. Everything is relative to time. You look at hockey or football, whatever, there were times when, yeah, those guys were professional athletes, but they still had day jobs. In boxing, you have all this history behind it, the Muhammad Ali Act, the systems that are now in place, thats all part of the culture. This sport doesnt have that yet. This, like any other sport in many ways, is an opportunity for rich men to -- whats the word Im looking for? -- were chess pieces for billionaires to take on other billionaires.But I think its great to have a Hollywood agency in charge moving forward. With Bellator MMA, you have Viacom behind them and everything they do on the television side. Thats part of some of the contracts Bellator has written, that you can have a television show built around you. I look at myself and see the free agency as a huge positive right now, with the sides that are involved.Fighter (more than five years with UFC, has fought for title)I feel like what MMA will become some day and how fighters will be treated, I probably wont feel that during my years in the sport. Thats something Ive accepted. Im getting the most out of it while I can.The genius part of what the UFC did is they were able to write all these different responsibilities into the same contract. And they can provide additional opportunities or take them away. No matter how good you are at one thing, they can pull you off in a second and replace you with someone else. Were all just spokes on a wheel. The UFC was able to sell for $4 billion because they were able to create a situation where, as athletes, were promoting the business. We dont promote ourselves as individual athletes without promoting the overall business of the UFC.What do I do to change that? You tell me. Im a spoke on a wheel and Ive accepted that. What if the UFC were to tell me, Well take every fight youve ever had and well hold it. Well stop showing it. Every fight youve had with us does not exist now. Well cut your contract. Thats it. I dont exist now. Its not that they would do that or have ever threatened to do that, but I understand the realness of the situation. I think being sold for this amount of money is a step in the right direction. Is a fighters union something we all might need? Possibly, yes. But Im looking at it realistically and saying that during my career, I dont see it happening. I will have helped the company out more than my own brand. I need the UFC platform to grow, so Im going to continue helping it grow. I like having a job. I need this job. Im a blue-collar individual. Im not rich. When youve worked as long as I have, you learn how to be happy with what you get when you get it.Fighter (more than five years with UFC, has fought for title)?If I had 50 cents for every action figure I signed, Id be a millionaire. The UFC tells me to sign autographs, and I dont see any money from that. I turn on a UFC video game and see myself on there, and Im asking, When did I sign a contract that let people put me in a video game without paying me for it? How am I allowed to sign that contract? I dont know if that will change or not with the new owners. These are guys are smart, powerful people. I hope so.Fighter (more than five years with UFC)Fighters, a lot of times, are uneducated. Theyre happy to get their $20,000 scraps and say, Whatever, man, Im just happy to work. The idea of a union is tough, because you have a few guys who can afford to say, I dont have to fight for a year. Then youve got a whole bigger group of guys who say, F--- that, Ive got to fight.What is this going to turn into? What does the sale have to do with it? I think it has lit a fire under peoples ass. Youre going to have to take one of the biggest champions, one of the brightest stars, to go to a press conference and drop the ball and say, F--- everybody, this is what Im doing. Thats what it would take. Who in their right mind would do that? Its really risky, to say, Im going to turn down $10 million to fight on pay-per-view but Im going to put my name in history forever to start this thing. That, in my mind, is what has to happen.ManagerI think Lorenzo especially saw there were other avenues for other interests he wants to pursue, and it was his time to move forward. We dont know what Danas role is going to be. He can say nothing has changed, but in the corporate world you understand how it works. People dont put money into something to not have control.When this new ownership takes over, I hope theres a window of opportunity for a collaboration between fighters, managers and agents to change some of the things that are very controlling in their contracts. They are very limiting. And I think some of the UFCs growth has been stymied by the leash that has been put on the fighters. I do think this opens a big door for a fighters union, because I think there is a lot of interest now in whats being done in this sport. I think it has to change. WME understands the acting and sports world. The athletes they represent in other sports have associations to back them. Actors have the Screen Actors Guild. I just dont see how that is not pursued in this sport within the next couple years.Fighter (more than five years with UFC, has fought for title)I think its good. I know that WME was a big part of the UFCs success and Ronda Rouseys success because they represented her. Now its going to be interesting because there are going to be two sides of this thing. Theyre going to try to build fighters as big as possible, which they have the means to do that with access to so much media, but then theyre also, as the owner, going to try to keep the fighter pay to a minimum.So I think its going to be a good thing overall. The bigger a person gets, the more notoriety and clout they get, the more they can demand. I think all in all, having this entertainment group behind us is going to be a good thing. ' ' '